
temperature of 0 °C around an inner shell filled with ice. In the
core of the inner shell was a wire cage housing a guinea pig. As
theice melted fromthe heatproduced by theguinea pig, thewater
flowed out of the calorimeter and was collected and weighed.
Each kilogram of melted ice water represented 80 kcal heat given
off by the animal. Lavoisier noted that, in 10 h, the guinea pig
melted 0.37 kg ice, thus producing 29.6 kcal heat (0.37 kg ҂
80 kcal heat/kg). He concluded, “la respiration est donc une
combustion.” That is, respiratory gas exchange is a combustion,
like that of a candle burning.
TABLE 1
Comparison of weight losses attained with consumption of high-protein (HP) and/or low-carbohydrate (LC) diets with those attained with consumptionof
high-carbohydrate (HC) and/or low-fat (LF) diets
1
Study (reference) Subjects HP and/or LC diet HC and/or LF diet
Length of
study Mean weight loss
wk
Ad libitum energy intake
2
Foster et al, 2003 (10) 63 obese men and
women aged 앒44 y
(49 completed 12
wk, 42 completed 24
wk, and 37
completed 52 wk)
Total dietary energy intake
not reported; subjects
instructed to follow
Atkins diet (1). Intake
ad libitum.
Total dietary energy intake not
reported; men and women instructed
to consume 1500–1800 and 1200–
1500 kcal/d, respectively; both
15%P, 25%F, 60%C.
52 HP diet for 12 wk, 6.7 kg; HC diet
for 12 wk, 2.6 kg; difference: P
҃ 0.001
HP diet for 24 wk, 6.9 kg; HC diet
for 24 wk, 3.1 kg; difference: P
҃ 0.02
HP diet for 52 wk, 4.3 kg; HC diet
for 52 wk, 2.4 kg; difference: P
҃ 0.26
Samaha et al, 2003 (13) 132 severely obese men
and women aged
54 앐 9
3
y (79
completed 24 wk)
1630 앐 894 kcal/d (22%P,
41%F, 37%C); intake
ad libitum.
1576 앐 760 kcal/d (16%P, 33%F,
51%C); intake fixed.
24 HP diet, 5.8 앐 8.6 kg; HC diet, 1.9
앐 4.2 kg; difference: P ҃ 0.002
Skov et al, 1999 (11) 50 overweight and
obese men and
women aged 18–55 y
(46 completed 24 wk)
0–12 wk, 2055 kcal/d
(25%P, 29%F, 46%C);
12–24 wk, 2223 kcal/d
(24%P, 29%F, 47%C);
intake ad libitum.
0–12 wk, 2533 kcal/d; 12–24 wk, 2677
kcal/d; both phases 12%P, 29%F,
59%C; intake ad libitum.
24 HP diet for 12 wk, 7.5 kg; HC diet
for 12 wk, 5.0 kg; difference: P
쏝 0.02
HP diet for 24 wk, 8.7 kg; HC diet
for 24 wk, 5.0 kg; difference: P
҃ 0.0002
Brehm et al, 2003 (12) 53 obese women aged
31–59 y (42
completed 24 wk)
12 wk, 1156 kcal/d (28%P,
57%F, 15%C), 24 wk,
1302 kcal/d (23%P,
46%F, 30%C); intake
ad libitum.
12 wk, 1245 kcal/d (18%P, 28%F,
54%C); 24 wk, 1247 kcal/d (18%P,
29%F, 53%C); intake fixed.
24 HP diet for 12 wk, 7.6 앐 0.7 kg;
HC diet for 12 wk, 4.2 앐 0.8
kg; difference: P 쏝 0.001
HP diet for 24 wk, 8.5 앐 1.0 kg;
HC diet for 24 wk, 3.9 앐 1.0
kg; difference: P 쏝 0.001
Fixed energy intake
4
Luscombe et al, 2003 (16) 36 obese men and
women aged 34–65 y
Energy restriction for 12
wk, 1520 kcal/d energy
balanced for 4 wk, 1928
kcal/d; both phases
27%P, 27%F, 45%C.
Energy restriction for 12 wk, 1592
kcal/d (16%P, 27%F, 57%C) energy
balanced for 4 wk, 1968 kcal/d
(15%P, 28%F, 57%C).
16 HP diet, 7.9 앐 1.1 kg (x 앐 SEM);
HC diet, 8.0 앐 0.7 kg;
difference: NS
Luscombe et al, 2002 (18) 32 obese men and
women aged 앒63 y
(26 completed 8 wk)
Energy restriction for 8
wk, 1585 앐 42 kcal/d
(x 앐 SEM; 28%P,
28%F, 45%C); energy
balanced for 4 wk,
1844 앐 78 kcal/d
(28%P, 28%F, 43%C).
Energy restriction for 8 wk, 1583 앐 62
kcal/d (x 앐 SEM; (16%P, 26%F,
55%C); energy balanced for 4 wk,
1777 앐 130 kcal/d (16%P, 26%F,
56%C).
12 HP diet, 4.9 앐 0.4 kg (x 앐 SEM);
HC diet, 4.3 앐 0.7 kg;
difference: P ҃ 0.6
Layman et al, 2003 (15) 24 overweight women
aged 45–56 y
1670 앐 47 kcal/d (x 앐
SEM; 30%P, 29%F,
41%C)
1659 앐 40 kcal/d (x 앐 SEM; 16%P,
12%F, 58%C)
10 HP diet, 7.5 앐 1.4 kg (x 앐 SEM);
HC diet, 7.0 앐 1.4 kg;
difference: NS
Baba et al, 1999 (14) 13 obese men 앒1790 kcal/d (45%P,
30%F, 25%C)
앒1763 kcal/d (12%P, 30%F, 58%C) 4 HP diet, 8.3 앐 0.7 kg (x 앐 SEM);
HC diet, 6.0 앐 0.6 kg;
difference: P 쏝 0.05
Piatti et al, 1994 (17) 30 obese women aged
40 앐 3 y (25
completed 3 wk)
800 kcal/d (45%P, 20%F,
35%C)
800 kcal/d (20%P, 20%F, 60%C) 3 HP diet, 4.5 앐 0.4 kg (x 앐 SEM);
HC diet, 6.4 앐 0.9 kg;
difference: NS
1
P, dietary protein; F, dietary fat; C, dietary carbohydrate. Intakes of P, F, and C are expressed as percentages of total energy intake.
2
For at least one intervention group.
3
x 앐 SD (all such values) unless otherwise noted.
4
For both intervention groups.
900S BUCHHOLZ AND SCHOELLER
Komentarze do niniejszej Instrukcji